Everything is a Publishing Tool Now
Good morning. This week: three companies quietly shipped a CMS, the analytics backlash finds a business model, and a short note on why your archive page matters more than your homepage.
Three companies shipped a CMS this week and none of them called it that
A note taking app, a design tool, and a customer support platform all launched public publishing features in the same fortnight. None used the word "blog" in the announcement. All three shipped custom domains, RSS, and an email sending path on day one.
The interesting part is not the feature. It is that publishing has become a table stakes retention mechanism: if your users are already writing inside your product, letting them publish is cheaper than watching them export to something else. Expect the next round to add comments, and the round after that to rediscover moderation.
Read the full analysisThe analytics backlash finally has a business model
Privacy first analytics has spent five years as a principled niche with weak retention. Two vendors this quarter reported that the pitch which actually converts is not privacy, it is that the dashboard is comprehensible. Fewer numbers, all of them explicable.
That is a much more durable wedge than compliance, because compliance gets solved once and comprehension has to be re-earned every quarter.
Continue readingYour archive page matters more than your homepage
Homepages are for people who already know who you are. Archives are for the person who arrived from a two year old link and is deciding whether there is anything else here worth their time. Almost nobody designs the second experience, and it is the one that converts.
If you do one thing this month, make your archive browsable by topic rather than only by date. Date ordering serves the publisher. Topic ordering serves the reader.
See how ours is built- A practical guide to design tokens that survive a rebrand, which does the unglamorous work of explaining the naming model rather than just recommending one.
- The slow web, on why completion rate is the only engagement metric that gets worse when you make the page more manipulative.
- An interview on twenty years of type design, including a good answer on why the tools got faster and the job did not get shorter.
- The last working boatyards of the Adriatic, eighteen photographs and a headcount that is going in one direction.


The section on pacing is the part I keep coming back to. Most guides talk about length, almost none about rhythm. This is the first piece that made the distinction land for me.
Thanks John. Rhythm was the whole reason I wrote it. Length is easy to measure, which is exactly why everyone optimises for it instead.
Bookmarking this for the next time someone on my team asks why we cap line length. Having a reference beats re-arguing it every quarter.
Would love a follow-up covering how this holds up on mobile, where the measure is set by the viewport rather than by you.